Browsing This
NYT uncovers a unworthy, decrepit story of a SEO games of J.C. Penney
The New York Times has run an incredibly detailed square about a feat of Google poke engine gaming which seems to have been finished by or for JC Penney. We won’t gimlet you with SEO basis — we’re pretty certain you’ve got those down already — though suffice to contend which The Times noticed which the retailer was during a tip of Google’s search formula for many some-more terms than seemed probable or natural, so they started to do some digging. What they found was that thousands of links had been placed on what were radically spam sites all over the web, ensuing in the tradesman ruling the Google juice for terms such as “small black skirt,” as well as even super general ones similar to “rugs” as well as “bedding.” This is one of the dreaded kinds of ‘black shawl’ optimization which Google frowns upon, since it’s so obviously cheating, and it’s punishable by a large falling of the offending site’s ranking in results (which is, of course, not the desired effect).
JC Penney unsurprisingly denies knowing anything about it, and no justification exists to indicate it was directly concerned, so on Wednesday, Google began ‘corrective movement’ to move Penney’s formula behind to world earth. One e.g. — before a action was taken, JC Penney held the series a single spot for the poke tenure ‘living room seat,’ as well as after it stood at series 68 — is enough to show a overwhelming energy Google binds over a results it delivers, though a story also serves to show how truly broken search is, as well as Google’s seeming insouciance about the issue. Hit up a source couple for a full story.